A technical question. This First 5000 words of Spanish course shares levels with the Introductory/Intermediate/Advanced Spanish 1-2. Is it still possible to create such courses? (I couldn’t find the functionality.) It would be good to have a course that aggregates the official Memrise 1-7 courses as it is quite annoying to review them one by one. Also a unified Top-up course would be handy, although I haven’t even finished the 1st one yet.
Yes I know that button is there, but I don’t want to create new courses from scratch, rather link together existing courses like this course does.
So if I completed this course, I also completed the Introductory/Intermediate/Advanced Spanish 1/2, because they share the same database, so all my learned and ignored words, and review periods, etc. in the big course appear in the smaller courses and vice versa, doesn’t matter which one I use.
I would like to make a similar big course from Memrise official 1-7 courses, and manual copy is not an option because I don’t want to lose my learning history in these courses. However I couldn’t find an option to link whole levels from the existing courses to a new course while keeping the database link to the items, but this course (or the smaller ones) did it somehow. Is there still a possibility?
ian_mn would it be possible to merge your top up 1-8 courses into this one so that we have one big 10k word list? keeping streak on 8 separate courses is quite cumbersome…
I could actually script it to avoid manual entry of thousands of words…
what do you think?
maybe create an inquiry here and see if others agree with me?
Hi, thanks for thinking about this, and your suggestion.
My reason for the multiple Top Up courses was to restrict course sizes to about ~750 to ~1000 words. About four years ago, a member of the Memrise staff (BenWhatley) created a reformatted version of the xoviat 5000 course with ~750 words per course (and they’re still available and popular). So, I decided to match that format.
I believe that the primary reason for Memrise wanting smaller courses was to avoid memory limitation issues on hand-held devices that some users were experiencing. But I suspect a secondary reason could have been that smaller courses tend to be more popular with users.
Right now, I don’t think I’d want to create a large, combined, duplicate course for the Top Up courses. Scripting the item entry process would be helpful, but we would then have two parallel course structures to maintain. If you could persuade the Memrise staff to create a combo course with automatic linking of edits from the Top Up courses, that would work. But I don’t think they’re likely to have time to do that.
On my iphone recently the listening section on memrise has been acting up. For example when I have to listen to a word and pick the correct audio it says its incorrect even though it is actually the correct one. Does anyone else have this problem? I have tried everything; i have restarted my phone, reinstalled the app and signed in and out but still to no avail. Thanks in advance.
Hi, I took a look at this previously, and I’m still inclined to leave this item (and two related items) unchanged. Here were my thoughts from a few months ago:
… we’ve currently got:
Level 44: el escrito = document (not documento)
Level 27: la escritura = writing (not “la redacción”)
Level 53: la redacción = writing (not “la escritura”), editing; editorial office/team; essay
I’m thinking that although there’s some overlap that’s not reflected in the current definitions, expanding the definitions would probably degrade the learning process for typical learners. So, I’m inclined to leave these as they are for now.
Level 49, el compás: the Spanish translation appears on the English side. I see there’s been some discussion about this entry last year, so I’m not sure if this is intentional.
I’ve lost count of how many times I have written “la atractividad” rather than “el atractivo” for “attractiveness (noun)”. Would it be possible to add it as an alternative answer or is there a reason I’m missing why one is correct and one isn’t?