This is how a lot of people feel I think - certainly how I do.
10 Likes
Over the 6 years Iāve been baffled what a team of now 85 is doing every day. Seriously lol itās just a flashcard website (I learn Mandarin). I wouldnāt care what they did as long as they didnāt keep removing functions. Now I donāt know whether to laugh or cry because removing meme ratings (created over 2000 in HSK) is pale in comparison to removing all community courses (I know itās moving to another website, just exaggerating)
I donāt care about the app. I donāt like it and it fails to download my most important courses anyway, so Iāll give decks a try. If decks is bad Iāll just cancel my pro subscription and completely switch over to Anki lol
RIP Memrise
5 Likes
If this decision is based on a funding issue, you could consider going down the non-profit route and partnering with someone like Khan Academy. Memrise would be a great advantage towards developing the one-world classroom. Memrise is already very popular in UK schools to support language learning etc as it is.
2 Likes
Suggestion
1 Like
True ā¦
or even Wikipedia/Wikiversity
1 Like
Just a tiny fraction of any advanced countryās education budget would support this and provide a far higher return in terms of outcome of language learning - politics would get in the way in making that a reality unfortunately.
1 Like
Hi all - our CEO Ed published a post on our blog just now to expand more on our reasons for launching Decks and to answer some of the questions youāve raised
4 Likes
we did come to this decision after a careful analysis of how and where community-created content is being learned, which is overwhelmingly online.
Then why so many users are pissed off?
And there are still many more users who do not know about these changes.
8 Likes
Itās āoverwhelmingly onlineā, as you claim, because the way you built and have gradually caused the appās degradation makes it harder to find community courses on there, in favour of promoting your own material. Deliberately creating the conditions required in order to get the statistics you desire is not good business ā itās quite absurd. I wonāt even use the app for this reason. So I myself contribute to this artificial statistic of yours, by using many community created courses and only doing so online (who cares, though, 'cause Iām not paying you).
11 Likes
Seems we are in the minority on this thread if the vast majority of paying and app users are using the Memrise courses mostly.
Sadly as a user since 2012 and a paying member since 2015 I have now cancelled my pro membership. I will use Decks when it is available and see what the experience is like.
Best wishes for the future - still seems crazy you are turning away a long-time paying customer wanting to give you money for your existing offering though!
6 Likes
Thanks Kevin. I think the consensus is pretty clear. No one really cares that itāll be a separate website. What people really care about is that community courses are available in a native app with offline mode. And people are willing to pay for it. I, for one, would consider re-purchasing my lifetime pro membership I just had refunded.
15 Likes
Will you provide long-time users of your platform an easy way to migrate their decks to another SRS that does offer offline access to user generated decks? I donāt use your website other than card creation and have no desire to, honestly.
Would rather cash in my chips and go somewhere else that wonāt just completely sever my jugular because āreasonsā.
2 Likes
Well said. Proof that this massive thread of people repeatedly pointing out exactly what you did has barely been more than skimmed by Memrise brass. Everyone hereās mostly saying THEY USE COMMUNITY COURSES OFFLINE AND THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE PAYING FOR ā how thick are you guys?
8 Likes
āWeāre listening to you. Here is why we donāt care.ā
16 Likes
Thanks for the clarification!
Iāve only used Memrise on desktop anyway, so these changes wonāt affect me.
Are there any plans for an API to Decks? That way the affected users could get together and make their own app, and people like me could make plugins weāve been wanting.
2 Likes
Thank you for sharing and responding to questions. Makes sense, with the exception that, I think you could make a paid version of an app for Decks, just exactly mimicking the current app (even if website remains free) and increase the price of Decks app subscription compared to current Memrise pro. Please reconsider that option.
6 Likes
āSince focusing on our own language courses, weāve grown twenty times over, and a very small proportion of learning on our mobile apps now happens on community-made courses.ā
Thatās not surprising as if you only use the app, rather than the website, you wouldnāt even know community made courses exist. As it is thereās no functional search for community courses. If you actually promoted community courses for immediate/ advanced learners and those that have completed the Memrise course for their chosen language, you would have MANY MORE MULTI-YEAR LOYAL SUBSCRIBERS. I suggest you call one of your investors and ask them to explain to you why a customer that subscribes for ten years (including price rises) is worth more than one that only wants to use your app for a few months.
My history with Memrise is that I was a subscriber for several years using the Memrise courses for Korean (which was before a number of your competitors launched with far superior beginner courses e.g. LingoDeer). I then started weekly evening classes. I was fully intending to unsubscribe to Memrise as I hadnāt used it for many months, when I remembered the community courses and found a whole series of community made courses (with audio!) to accompany the textbooks we follow in class.
"Why no mobile app for Decks?
The decision to create Decks as a website only is down to resources (though the site will work smoothly on your mobile web-browser)."
This is an assertion, not a statement of fact. If you are so confident in this mobile website, then launch it for six months and allow your loyalest users to compare it to the app experience (keeping the community courses in the Memrise app). Apps exist because mobile browsing is generally a poor experience. It doesnāt take many resources to fork the app which YOUR EXISTING COMMUNITY USERS ARE GENERALLY HAPPY TO PAY FOR. MANY USERS ALSO WANT OFFLINE ACCESS.
"Why no monetisation?
Focusing all our resources in developing the Memrise apps and website will also allow us to maintain Decks as a free website. We wonāt actively invest in creating new learning features for it, but we also donāt have plans to make money from our learners on Decks."
Why do you want to lose paying subscribers. Iām happy to pay for online and offline access THROUGH AN APP, to community courses. If the Memrise courses improve, I would be happy to PAY FOR TWO SUBSCRIPTIONS.
Sorry I do not accept the resources argument. Drops has over 30 apps on Google Play. Clone the existing Memrise app and call it āDecksā.
What you are proposing means less revenue and a poorer user experience, with many users abandoning you for other platforms.
LISTEN TO USER FEEDBACK:
EITHER:
PAID āDECKSā APP WITH OFFLINE MODE
OR:
KEEP THINGS HOW THEY ARE.
11 Likes
If Memrise was currently offering something like MoviePass and it seemed too good to be true (and turned out to be) then it would be easier to be more sanguine about the offering changing.
Itās just hard to accept that what was being offered and happily paid for turns out to be so uneconomical and that so few fellow (ex)Pro members were using the app for community course learning (like I was).
So few in fact that it seems there is no conceivable price point that Memrise could run a support team to manage an app.
2 Likes
Blockquote
Since focusing on our own language courses, weāve grown twenty times over, and a very small proportion of learning on our mobile apps now happens on community-made courses.
Blockquote
This is one of the key phrases. Community-made courses have not been shown in the app for some years, so now less people use them, and their interests can easily be neglected. You were planning this step from the start, and I was just another idiot to trust you.
16 Likes
Ok, itās like I thought. Memrise wants to play in a league with others like Rosetta Stone or what ever. To make this happen in an easy way it has to get rid of the community-created content. To much work to deal with them, too. So you push it on a hospice website to die, please not too loud and too much complaining thatās why we promise you its for free and āforeverā.
I paid live time membership not long ago and there was not even a hint that you could change the system that radical. So I wonāt take your promises or trust them. Just counting the weeks and see at the end how much I paid per month what I was promised to be for ālife-timeā. Next time Iāll be more careful.
No matter what you are so greatful designing or planning, no money any more from me.
8 Likes