Where in my post did I say there is a problem? I simply shared a post that I found on the official Memrise Product Development Blog about their motivations for totally revamping Memrise in the way they have done.
The fact that Ziggy is either androgynous, genderless, or non-binary was not news to me. I initially read it six months ago, when Luke stated it in his June post on the Memrise Blog that Ziggy is “androgynous.”
https://blog.memrise.com/2017/06/26/meet-ziggy-memrises-new-mascot/
At that time I don’t think that many users gave Luke’s description of Ziggy much thought, because most people don’t choose to spend their time contemplating the gender-identity of space-jellyfish.
What I found very interesting, puzzling, and surprising in this current article, was that the Memrise team stated that in order to make a statement about their “progressive values,” they had deliberately injected the very controversial subject of gender-identity into what previously had been a very straightforward flash card app.
Why would they decide to make their space-jellyfish character explicitly “non-binary,” which according to Wikipedia, is a synonym for “gender-queer,” which is a term that many people would have a reaction to? And having decided to make a socio-political statement with their product, then they should not be surprised if customers, who may or may not share their socio-political viewpoint, express their positive or negative reactions, especially when the product is often used by children in a scholastic setting.
I would have been equally puzzled if they said that they had decided to make their imaginary space-jellyfish explicitly Christian, Sikh, Jewish, or Moslem, for example. Why inject such emotionally charged and divisive attributes into a space-jellyfish in a flash card app? What would they hope to gain by doing so?
Memrise used to be a simple but effective learning tool, with a great community of contributors, that started off with a gardening metaphor. Flowers and gardening are simple to understand and as non-divisive, inoffensive, and non-controversial as any metaphor could possibly be. Why throw that all away and replace it with an “irreverent”, “non-binary” space-jellyfish? Don’t they want to appeal to the widest possible audience?
So, the focus of my post is not primarily on the ill-conceived space-jellyfish’s lack of gender, but on the Memrise team’s incomprehensible decisions to destroy a system that worked and everyone liked about their product, and take things in a very strange, controversial, and alien direction.