In addition:
As I already said in October:
Which answer was requested used to be clear from the column label, but in the beta there is no column label in the question.
For example:
Should I respond with the composer or the title of this musical piece?
Good point. At the moment there are Memrise courses for multiple source languages, not just English - though English does have the most choice. But you are right that there are lots of less learned language pairs that are currently poorly served. In the early days of Memrise we did have central “wikis” for each language, which allowed us to curate central dictionaries of high quality for many more language pairs than we currently do. This is the model that we are going back to. This will make it easier for us to support courses in more language pairs. It is our intention to move over as any language pairs from the current user made courses as is of high enough quality.
So I see the problem you are pointing to, and believe that the approach we are taking will give a solution to it.
I’d be happy to talk more over a call to go into details.
There is no set time frame for closing non language courses. It will not happen fast. When we have got the ability for users to create language courses in the main Memrise product, and have moved over the user made courses to that system, we will be left with the non language courses on the legacy system. We have no plan to shut that down as this moment. But our plans are all focused on serving the language learners ever more effectively, in the learning of vocab and learning to use that vocab in live situations. The non language courses are not part of that vision.
However no decision has been taken to close them down. What I am sharing here is our intention and where we will be focused. We can of course continue to discuss the best way to manage the non language courses that are left. I’d be happy to find a good solution - and we have plenty of time to work this through.
Again, I’d love to have a call to talk about this and go into more detail.
I agree on the need for this. This is a feature that we would like to add to the new platform, separate to the re-introduction of mems.
We are not going to delete them from the database, and yes we’ll work a way to bring them back as soon as possible. I can’t give a timeline on that though, which is why this post initially said that we would just be removing them; the support team didn’t want to promise something that had an unknown timeline. I too cannot promise it nor give a timeline. But I can promise we won’t delete them and that I will be pushing hard to get them reintroduced as soon as we can.
We have 12 pedagogic principles that guide the language teaching approach that we take. These come out of the resaerch I noted above (Krashen etc) and which was my impetus to found the company. These are:
Learn - Words & phrases fast. This requires:
Immerse - Learning to understand humans. This requires:
Communicate - Learning to be understood by other humans. This requires:
You’ll note that the second one, “Helping you to Encode memories richly” is answered perfectly by mems. I know of no better way to deliver on that principle. These 12 principles are not going to change. The product team will be using these are they design solutions to the problems language learners have. That is why I am confident that we will be brining mems back soon; I recognise that not being able to give you a hard date or a hard promise will be annoying, but I hope this helps to give you some comfort that the intention is sincere.
Sorry, I’m sure I’ve missed dozens of important points here. I’ll try to get to replying earlier in the evening tomorrow. Thanks for taking the time to write, I know many of you are angry and I do appreciate your engaging in this conversation.
The offer remains open for a video call in the next few days to talk through our medium term plans and the reasoning behind them - please do post saying if you’d like to attend.
It took two days to go from
to
What’s wrong with Memrise that you can be so easily swayed?
I just finished writing a script for downloading mems from the site in bulk. It can gather all the mems made by a specified user.
Here is a link to a result of a test run
I am willing to lend a hand to anybody needing help with saving their personal mems or assist with making a community archive. All I need is the names of mem’s creators to save.
Unfortunately, mems cannot be directly linked to the courses they were created for, but I hope this still will be useful in some way. Just as a database to browse in search of ideas or, perhaps, as a basis for a script to make Anki cards.
Absolutely. Plus, mems are much harder to find and use on mobile phones than the pc version; so as the majority of learners are using the mobile version, it would make perfect sense that the mems aren’t being used as much. Their statistics are misleading them, and they’re inferring wrongly from the numbers without understanding the real cause and meaning for them. What they should be doing is improving Mem access for mobile phone users, so the learners will be more inclined to use that beneficial tool. Then Memrise would become even more popular, as learners who go there from any device would be more effectual learners of those things they desire. The Mems also provide a great community-building means of engaging with other learners in creative ways.
Shhh, nooooo, we want that! 
Would you please address the typing-only issue? One of the things I love about this site compared to Duolingo is that I’m not forced to mouse-click a bunch of stuff like a bird pecking at seed. Unless you are on a cell phone, it is painfully tedious and time-consuming, not to mention far less challenging and fruitful for effort spent. (On the cell phone, actually it’s the typing that’s tedious. 
)
Compared to the new Memrise experience, I’m not kidding when I say I use my keyboard more reviewing on Duolingo than on here. At least there, once you pass the first couple of “levels” of each module or whatever they call them, it transitions to type-only for review sessions. Not case-sensitive type-only, but type-only all the same, which is GREAT for if you are on a desktop computer. Please, it can’t be that hard to return this feature before forcing everyone over to Beta. PLEASE.
Please return the old, more forgiving, algorithm of matching typed text input. In the mandarin course, the input was accepted without any spaces. In the new version, it now requires spaces between some syllables (not always, looks difficult to guess where). In languages with longer words, typing spaces is not such a burden, but in language, where average “word” is two letters long, is typing spaces very cumbersome (and not really needed as nearly any sentence can be parsed correctly anyway). Even worse is that, when using chinese IME, the space key has special control meaning and it is extremely bad to get habit of pressing space after a syllable written (the IME needs bigger context to be able to choose the right chinese characters for inherently ambiguous pinyin text).
I just activate my account here to say that I am very very disappointed to your decisions to force roll out the beta and remove the mem feature.
The beta is so bad that I opt-out it at least several months ago.
As for the mem feature, while I seldom use it, I can see this is a valuable way to memorise something that is too hard to remember. It can provide more contexts about a flashcard if the card itself lacks some infotmation. As what I learn is most of time easy to remember (the flashcard has abundant information), the mem seems unnecessary. But clearly, this feature is useful in many situations, so I strongly oppose your decision to remove it.
The same goes for Japanese. In some courses it is particularly hard to predict, where you are expected to put spaces. There don’t seem to be any consistent rules at all. And if you misplace even one space, the card is considered to be failed.
Honestly, this is ridiculous.
I am using Memrise since around 2015 and mems were always super helpful. Even if I am not creating them by myself, mems created by other users I use almost every time I learn a new word/character/term/phrase. Mems especially useful when I need example sentences, associations, deeper explanations, depictions or just jokes that help to remember.
You can go with the new option, i.e. “more rich experience”, for courses provided by your website, but removing mems from the courses created by users themselves seems like nonsense. Do you have any idea about how much time and effort people have put in creating it? It’s just like a spit in the face for all of them… actually, it is even worse.
I didn’t think that I’ll regret paying for subscription. I feel really angry about this decision of yours. I just can’t get my head around the fact that you’re going to do it. This is just so ridiculous.
@BenWhately
I’ve never been active on the forum but I wanted to come here and second all that’s been said above. I’m a pretty heavy, paid user as you can see from my profile (26k words, 44m points). @Sergio.NES’s post nails 100% my thoughts and I only have a couple more points to add:
tl;dr I’m pissed, annoyed, and frustrated
You know, I have always preferred Memrise to any other apps, like Quizlet, Anki. I have always though that all the bugs you have, all the missing features (like automatic vocalization for words added by users), I have justified all that by thinking “no other apps/websites have mems, this is such a cool feature”. I have also recommended it to all of my friends, now I am regretting doing so.
That said, I don’t like new design at all.
You’re just leaving me with no choice, but to move to some other app.
I also use mems. Hope you reconsider.
guys stop, it is pretty obvious they are doing the ‘new coke’ strategy. You are going to hate this new memrise so much, that they are going to create a bunch of nostalgic demand for old memrise. It’s 4D chess.
on a more serious note, they just want to dumb down the website. Typing is too hard for people they are marketing the new memrise for.
Please dont remove the feature, without it I could not find a single reason to use memrise anymore.
This is good to hear, but, with all due respect, I think you need to be more careful with your words. In your previous reply, you just mentioned that non-language courses “will not fit in the new system,” which seems to imply that they will be retired sooner or later. You can’t imagine how frustrating or even scaring this is to hear for people who have been using non-language courses heavily:
While I do appreciate your ambition to develop Memrise as a more comprehensive learning-learning platform and I do understand why non-language courses may not fit in the new system, you shouldn’t leave us the impression that non-language courses are going to be simply abandoned (your earlier reply did give me such an impression). It’s okay that their development is not part of the site’s plan, but I think it’s not too much to say that Memrise has the responsibility to preserve them, as a respect to their creators and users. The same goes for the mems. To quote myself:
Now this is comforting to hear. Despite all the unfavourable events, I’m glad that we have an admin team that is listening, responsive, and visionary. I’m looking forward to the future Memrise!
Great. Count me in!
It’s incredible that you could actually say this and then fail to register that what you are doing here is taking away a system that people found does work for them, and deciding that this grand idea you have is better and will work for them and they should all stop doing what is working for them and do this new thing instead. Unfortunately I suppose this complete lack of self-awareness is quite characteristic of Memrise.
Ok, rather than just ragging on you for these rather stupid decisions, how about a suggestion? Why don’t you guys just leave the current Memrise as it is in a deprecated but still accessible state while you work on your MemWorld thing, instead of forcefully removing it while everyone waits what will likely be years for your new concept to come to fruition?
Ok, and what if I don’t WANT to have video content? Once again you are pushing this one system you guys have as though it’s the only thing that’ll ever work for anyone. Not everyone is you. Why can’t you understand that? Never mind how ridiculously inapplicable this entire concept is to various language learning circumstances. For example, how is a “rich test type that [goes] beyond word-definition pairs with accompanying video content” supposed to help me memorise a kanji and the radicals that make it up? Simple answer: it isn’t. It’s a completely inapplicable idea to what I want to learn, and what I have been using Memrise to learn.
