User talk:Julian Herzog

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radcliffe Camera Oxford 2018 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 09:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albert Bridge London 2020 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckingham Palace London Morning 2020 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter's Church Brackley 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel Of St Luke Radcliffe Infirmary Oxford 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ashmolean Museum Oxford 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge of Sighs Oxford 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menai Suspension Bridge Gwynedd 2019 Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 10:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brackley - Church of St Peter - 20230521170600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This needs perspective correction --FlocciNivis 16:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)@FlocciNivis: Sorry, missed this one, fixed. --Julian Herzog 19:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albert Memorial London 2020 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
needs PC - I would like to suggest a tighter crop to enhance focus on the subject --Virtual-Pano 07:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think the trees at the edges make the composition work, but no problem if that's disqualifying. --Julian Herzog 10:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
the crop is surely not a (dis)qualifying criterium, but the need for perspective correction is --Virtual-Pano 20:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Virtual-Pano: I have pc'ed it. I think it looks a bit ridiculous at this angle and prefer the original, but would you find this acceptable? --Julian Herzog 06:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support good quality --Virtual-Pano 15:53, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel Of St Luke Radcliffe Infirmary Oxford 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merton College Oxford 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radcliffe Camera Oxford 2018 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 04 Cupola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 19:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalen College Oxford 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radcliffe Observatory Oxford 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radcliffe Observatory Oxford 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menai Suspension Bridge Gwynedd 2019 Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image, but too dark. Useful to add CAT:Panoramics in ... --Tagooty 01:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tagooty: I have brightened it and added panoramics cats. --Julian Herzog 19:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FPC nomination[edit]

Hi Julian. I was looking at some photos from WLM23 and came across File:Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 03.jpg. I really like the composition and the golden hour light and am considering nominating it at FPC, unless you have any objections? Cheers, BigDom (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BigDom: Thank you, that is very kind, definitely no objections from me. — Julian H.✈ 21:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's live now: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 03.jpg. Good luck! BigDom (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radcliffe Observatory Oxford 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. ----Sunny365days 14:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St-Peter-in-the-East Oxford 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piccadilly Circus Tube Station West Entrance 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural History Museum London Central Hall 2020 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Featured picture to me ! Very nice, I love it. --Sebring12Hrs 10:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge of Sighs Oxford 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment needs a CW tilt --Virtual-Pano 16:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Virtual-Pano: I had a look, but I can't see it. The grey gutter on the left and the front edge of the building on the right are perfectly vertical. --Julian Herzog 19:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment the verticals are true, but the bridge is tilted pls check horizontals --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Virtual-Pano: The bridge goes away from the viewer, of course the horizontal lines are not horizontal on it. --Julian Herzog 06:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Shouldn't the horizontal bars of the central window pane be true nevertheless? --Virtual-Pano 14:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't think so, only if it was at eye level. --Julian Herzog 20:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We generally do not expect horizontal perspective correction unless the composition is going for, say, a perfectly symmetrical facade. --King of Hearts 06:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural History Museum London Central Hall Blue Whale Skeleton 2020 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 03.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sheldonian Theatre Oxford 2023 03.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckingham Palace East Gates 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. but the balcony windows need some TLC --Virtual-Pano 21:44, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St-Peter-in-the-East Oxford 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural History Museum London Central Hall Blue Whale Skeleton 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural History Museum London Central Hall 2020 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalen College Oxford 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter's Church Brackley 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Air Force Panavia Tornado GR4 ZA607 EB-X Corris Corner 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Charles Darwin Natural History Museum London 2020 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of Westminster Victoria Tower Gardens South 2020 Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merton College Oxford 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church Hinton-in-the-Hedges 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 14:24, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church Hinton-in-the-Hedges 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albert Memorial London 2020 03 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Church of St Mary the Virgin Oxford 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 18:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural History Museum London Central Hall Blue Whale Skeleton 2020 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! County Fire Office Piccadilly Circus London 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Usage restriction in EXIF[edit]

Hi Julian, congratulations to your amazing aviation photographs. However, I see, that you put a written usage restriction in the EXIF "Do not publish, private use only." which is incompatible with the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license, that explicitly allows republication and commercial use. This could lead to confusion for potential third party users. Can you confirm, that you do agree to republication and commercial use within the terms of the CC-BY-SA license? If so, I would recommend to modify the "Usage terms" field in the Exif data for future uploads. Cheers, MB-one (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MB-one: Apologies, yes that's me being clumsy in my file management, I didn't change the default in Lightroom. Do you think this is a big deal? It's a bit of a pain to rectify if it's not too bad I can try to at least fix it in future photos. — Julian H.✈ 18:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI and probably FP --Poco a poco 21:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 21:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 21:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 21:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 21:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 21:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 22:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USAF CV-22B Osprey 11-0058 RIAT 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 20:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USAF CV-22B Osprey 11-0058 RIAT 2023 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:23, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Royal International Air Tattoo 2023 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 20:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USAF CV-22B Osprey 11-0058 and MC-130J Hercules 08-6205 RIAT 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USAF CV-22B Osprey 11-0058 RIAT 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USAF CV-22B Osprey 11-0058 RIAT 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Very intersting image Spurzem 11:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USAF CV-22B Osprey 11-0058 RIAT 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Royal Air Force Panavia Tornado GR4 ZA607 EB-X Corris Corner 2018 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Royal Air Force Panavia Tornado GR4 ZA607 EB-X Corris Corner 2018 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal School of Mines Imperial College London 2020 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 19:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]