User talk:GZWDer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GZWDer!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It were names of the files (unrenamed): [1]. Lesless (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello GZWDer, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SUL finalization - Doing 7 replacements[edit]

Hello.
I am sure this wasn’t an isolated mishap. It isn’t vandalism, but it is worse than vandalism because subverts attribution records. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So… you can’t now pretend that abandoned this Commons account. Very sad not to see any comment. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Fort-orleans-return.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categorizing DRs[edit]

Hi. Because the DR process is heavily based on Transclusion, when categorizing DRs, please use <noinclude>[[Category:]]</noinclude>. This is to ensure that only the DR is categorized. Otherwise, the DR lists and the archive lists are also categorized. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 11:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:拉姆油画.jpg[edit]

Hi there,

  The copyright release evidence has been sent to the email you provided. Please check. Hiroooooo (talk) 04:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
An OTRS member will check it. I am not one.--GZWDer (talk) 04:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Inactive?[edit]

Dear GZWDer, Are you active or inactive, as your user page suggests? Vysotsky (talk)

File:白馬峰普天宮鎮殿聖母.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:大庄媽祖.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]