I don't have time anymore to contribute as actively as I did in the past. I still read my talk page and upload a picture from time to time, though. Feel free to contact me here, but please don't expect me to take an active part in Commons discussions. --Eusebius (talk) 15:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Anacridium aegyptium (Egyptian grasshopper). If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Fulfills criteria. I prefer the natural light. Lycaon (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support This is much more detailed at review size. We are supposed to be judging these images in terms of how they would be used in articles, which is as thumbnails. "Inferior in resolution" is not a valid reason to oppose a file that is larger and more detailed at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Thumbnail or not, both are excellent, FPs anyway. But here, the contrast between the colours is more attractive. Besides, the grasshopper is looking into the camera, as if he knew what's going on. --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Better light here and per others for the support. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Better lighting and composition. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
_on_crab_apple_(Malus_sylvestris)_Corfu.jpg){kind=link}
_on_crab_apple_(Malus_sylvestris)_Corfu.jpg){kind=link}