User talk:Cayambe
Archive
2010 – 2011 – 2012 – 2013 – 2014 – 2015
2016 – 2017 – 2018 – 2019 – 2020 – 2021
2019 – 2020 – 2021 – 2022
Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hollerich – Forage chaussée rue Guido-Oppenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville –Corniche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plaque 1797, Puerto de la Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corniche – Grund – Kirchberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Padre Pio, Iglesia N. S. de la Paz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bech-Gare, Amphithéâtre – sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Ntra. Sra. de la Paz, plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phalsbourg – Hôtel de ville, sept. 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! San Telmo rear facade, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rue Marie-Adélaïde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife – Montaña de las Arenas 2020a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tenerife, Puerto de la Cruz – Calle San Juan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grondhaff, Hôtel Brimer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hortulus – musée du Vieux Pérouges 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parking Campus Geesseknäppchen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pérouges, rue du Prince, 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lône du Content 2022 06 – Ain, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pérouges, monument du jubilé de 1886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pérouges, place de la Halle dite du Tilleul, 2022a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pérouges – descente depuis place de la Halle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hostellerie du Vieux Pérouges, large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia Ntra Sra de la Paz – Consecration plaque 2006 large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pérouges – Monument aux morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1 Station tram et bâtiment Jean-Braconnier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Moutte, commune de Viviers-sur-Rhône 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Commune de Viviers-sur-Rhône, paysage rural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viviers, vignoble à la Moutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viviers, vignoble et maisons à la Moutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Carrefour sur D859 près St-Restitut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg Cents – Restau Centser Roud Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Végétation près Saint-Restitut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Gëlle Fra World War I Memorial Luxembourg City 13 04 2008.jpg
- File:Luxemb Gëlle Fra March 3 2010 b.jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
One and the same[edit]
I cannot help from believing that A1Cafel and Adamant1 are one and the same User. :-( Cayambe (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)