User talk:Cayambe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive
201020112012201320142015
201620172018201920202021
2019202020212022





Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hollerich – Forage chaussée rue Guido-Oppenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 21:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville –Corniche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque 1797, Puerto de la Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corniche – Grund – Kirchberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Padre Pio, Iglesia N. S. de la Paz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bech-Gare, Amphithéâtre – sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Ntra. Sra. de la Paz, plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalsbourg – Hôtel de ville, sept. 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Telmo rear facade, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Marie-Adélaïde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife – Montaña de las Arenas 2020a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenerife, Puerto de la Cruz – Calle San Juan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grondhaff, Hôtel Brimer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortulus – musée du Vieux Pérouges 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parking Campus Geesseknäppchen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges, rue du Prince, 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lône du Content 2022 06 – Ain, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges, monument du jubilé de 1886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges, place de la Halle dite du Tilleul, 2022a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges – descente depuis place de la Halle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice shot, and nice place. --Terragio67 15:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 15:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hostellerie du Vieux Pérouges, large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Ntra Sra de la Paz – Consecration plaque 2006 large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit to noisy. Should be fixable. --MB-one 15:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks, noise reduced. Ok now? --Cayambe 17:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality now --MB-one 11:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges – Monument aux morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1 Station tram et bâtiment Jean-Braconnier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but I miss a cat about the station, the current cat is too generic --Poco a poco 17:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Tram station cat added. It had to be created. --Cayambe 19:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Thank you, I was rather thinking about something like "Tram stations in Lyon", but if you created this one, the better --Poco a poco 20:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Moutte, commune de Viviers-sur-Rhône 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commune de Viviers-sur-Rhône, paysage rural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viviers, vignoble à la Moutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viviers, vignoble et maisons à la Moutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrefour sur D859 près St-Restitut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Cents – Restau Centser Roud Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Végétation près Saint-Restitut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One and the same[edit]

I cannot help from believing that A1Cafel and Adamant1 are one and the same User. :-( Cayambe (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]