You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.
It seems you have an interest in plant profiles; I like such works. But you need to improve your photographic and analytic skills; so trying COM:QIC prior to COM:FPC may better. Just a friendly suggestion. Cheers. JKadavoorJee 02:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Since you have achieved voting rights by now, may I ask you to give again your supporting votes on FPC? Thanks
--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Por favor, não faça alterações grosseiras em imagens como as que fez aqui File:Rio night.jpg ou serei obrigado a comunicar os administradores do Commons. Espero que compreenda e agradeço desde já. Chronus (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please leave other people's images alone. I realise you are trying to improve but you are making very clumsy edits: very high noise reduction, over saturated, over sharpening. These are not improvements. If you think a photo can be improved, talk to the uploader/photographer first to see if they wish to try for improvements. It is much easier to improve an image with access to the RAW file and a modern RAW converter than to fiddle with the JPG. If you don't stop this, I shall ask an admin to stop you. Concentrate on your own photos please. -- Colin (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Fernanda Lima. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Please stop quick withdrawals; it is insulting to the potential contributors (who make those works) and an unnecessary overload to us. This is my second friendly reminder. (You can reply here as this page is in my watch list.) Jee 16:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St Olaf's Church, Tallinn. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: English Embankment, Saint Petersburg, Russia. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Dear ArionEstar
If POTD is taken by a FP, it should not be moved by others to another date. Will you explain this edit? --Monfie (talk) 10:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Monfie, according to the rules (which I read in Portuguese), I can change the picture. And I switched because had two dates with the same image, to which you put ([1]) and I put (Template: Potd/2014-02-22) and then I changed to the image (File:Needle Galaxy 4565.jpeg). You can let the Pol-e Dokhtar will not let that be a picture of the day. Cheers! ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 13:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see what happened now. I intended to set bridge image for that especial date so, if you don't mind, I put galaxy image there then revert your edit. Regards. --Monfie (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi ArionEstar. Thank you very much, I am pleased you enjoyed my photos of Saint-Georges-de-Didonne . But I'm really sorry I can not undertake the editing required, unfortunately I do not know how to do, I'm confused. Well, maybe a contributor will do it for me. Thank you for your encouragement. Best wishes and good weekend. Cordially.--Jlvenet (talk) 20:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please stop editing other people's photographs and uploading your version on top. The version of File:Stralsund Marienkirche 2006.jpg you uploaded was less than half the size of the original. You are clearly saving the JPG at a low quality setting and the JPG artefacts are quite visible. You have been warned by me and other another user already. Please stop or I will ask an admin to stop you. Touching up JPGs requires a lot of skill and avoided unless necessary. It is nearly always best to first ask the creator of the image to fix any problems. -- Colin (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Have a read about the quality setting on your Photoshop. You should set it higher. But every time one edits a JPG the quality deteriorates slightly so it is best avoided if at all possible. Btw, you can use Photoshop to see the difference between the two versions of your file. Open the original and then your version. Copy your version as a new layer on top of the original. Change the blending mode for the layer to "difference" and zoom to 100%. You will see lots of tiny differences. Also have a look at your version at 200% compared to the original at 200%. Neither are perfect but your version has more digital noise due to the JPG compression. So that's a lot of deterioration for the sake of a couple of dust spots that I'm sure few will notice. -- Colin (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hola, ArionEstar partiendo de los comentarios y sugerencias que emitieron algunos usuarios sobre sobre mi archivo: Sistema de regadío circular; , el cual usted sí emitió su voto a favor, algo que le agradezco mucho, y por la importancia e interés que considero pueda tener esta maquinaria para la agricultura, (además de su impacto visual por su forma y tamaño), donde pudiera ayudar apoyando algún proyecto de la comunidad, he decidido subir una nueva foto del mismo, pero donde puede verse el equipo en toda su magnitud con otra perspectiva, , e igualmente la he nominado a candidata a FP. Le hago saber esto pues agradecería y apreciaría muchísimo si usted pudiera pasar y dar su nueva valoración y opinión sobre esta foto actual. Muchas gracias nuevamente. Un saludo cordial Ivan2010
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
@ArionEstar No, I thought in Commons you select it according to FIFO...First in first out as in en-wiki..Herald talk with me 12:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Independência ou Morte(Independence or Death). If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Comment I would support, but I think that Framework is not the right word here. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann: Done. Previously mentioned here, for me it is the best framework of the history of Brazil, although not is quite match with the reality in the time.ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 11:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 14:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results:
We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks, the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Oi Arion. Agora solamente tiraré fotos não São Paulo, em decembro eu acredito no Recife tambem. Seria muito util si voce pudiera fazer uma lista de monumentos para ser fotografiados na ciudade São Paulo, alem disso para ser usado em WLM. --The Photographer (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Cada fin de semana estare tomando fotos, cuando você acredite que desee ir, pode acompanharme, o unico requisito e não conhecer nada de fotografia, um abrazo --The Photographer (talk) 22:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Wilfredo: Olá Wlfredor, boa noite. ;) Eu posso dizer que na minha estadia no Wikimedia Commons eu aprendi muita coisa sobre fotografia como foco, exposição, perspectiva, saturação... ArionEstar (talk) 22:29, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, Arionestar ! I think I've straightened the lamp posts without modifying the building. I'd like to send it to you, so as tou can see the difference between the two files but I don't know your internet address... I can, of course, upload the file myself... Tell me what to do, please. -- Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 16:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JLPC: The image needs only a perspective correction, because the lamp on the right side is tilted. If you can fix, you're welcome to upload a new version of the image. ArionEstar (talk) 17:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hope it's OK now. Cheers. --JLPC (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I wanted to let you know that your sig is in violation of the signature guideline because it contains an image. Please correct it. Regards, --AmaryllisGardenertalk 00:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi. Since you edited and directed the comment to me, and I don't know if there is the correct place for me to learn and discuss that, I will ask you here, .png applications are prohibited or something? Sorry, I'm really rookie at this, I can withdraw if that was a bad act. :P --Nakinn ✉ 04:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Nakinn. PNG serve only to images made by computer. Cheers! ArionEstar (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I can't see nothing in the rules prohibiting, or even in Commons. But ok, I have to/can withdraw? or I have to leave it there for archiving? --Nakinn ✉ 18:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Responded at my talk page. Start putting it into en-wiki articles, and I can probably at least get it featured there. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
P.S.: Olhando a Category:Featured pictures by country, percebo que o Brasil está "engatinhando" nas imagens destacadas. Enquanto outros países têm 40, 50, 60 imagens destacadas, o Brasil tem menos de 30 imagens. ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oi Arion, tudo bom?. Recomendo ler Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy, exactamente onde fala de (i.e., if you add "Category:Photos of London by User:Example" you still need to add "Category:London" to the same image). Que quer decir isto? que si você tenhe uma categoria "Category:Featured pictures of Brazil by User:Example" você deve anexar para cada imagem também "Category:Featured pictures of Brazil" --The Photographer (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Estoy escribiendo en español para mayor comodidad y rapidez :p. Estaba pensando en que me propusieras una lista de cosas para fotografiar por são paulo que ainda não haya fotografiado o que sus versiones en wikipedia en portugues no sean muy buenas --The Photographer (talk) 16:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi ArionEstar, I am not sure what you mean by expanded version. The current version is 4,288 × 2,850 which is the largest available. I do not know if there is a bigger version. Regards Originalwana (talk) 14:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Por pouco eu nao organizei o WLM no Brasil em 2014. Levei tanta pedrada por organizar o WLE que acabei deixando isso de lado. Mesmo os considerados ativos e "lideres" da Wikimedia Brasil foram contra e eu tive que comprar a briga sozinho. Cheguei a pesquisar editais e já tinha conseguido um apoio 100% garantido de algo em torno de R$60.000,00 para investir no WLE e WLM em 2015, mas acabei dispensando e nao me esforcei pra conseguir isso pois o prazo era curto e o apoio era zero. O WLE gerou resultados surpreendentes, a foto vencedora do Brasil ficou em segundo lugar na etapa internacional. Com certeza o o WLM tem ainda mais potencial, não sei se vou contribuir em algo aqui em 2015, a comunidade é muito hostil, principalmente com quem chega com muita energia querendo fazer as coisas acontecerem, como foi no meu caso. De qualquer forma, qualquer novidade me chame por aqui. Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
ArionEstar, when will you learn to stop editing photos like you do. There are ways of cropping that do not result in the file size halving when you shave a few pixels off the top. The best solution, if a crop is required, is to ask The Photographer to upload a new version cropped from his source files. If they are no longer available, then there are lossless cropping tools and also a page you can request crops on Commons (I forget where). Please leave the images alone. -- Colin (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oi ArionEstar O ideal, nesses casos, é para pedir ajuda o autor a fazer isso e, geralmente, é subida como uma obra derivada. Este fim de semana, eu tento fazer o upload do arquivo RAW para que você possa fazer o corte como um derivado da versão melhor qualidade. --The Photographer (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dê um zoom: [2] entre a imagem espelhada e a fruta mesmo e você entenderá a razão pela qual não dá para deixar aquela imagem. ;) -- RTA 21:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
PS: Pode estar melhor, mas a segunda está exatamente como a goiaba que eu tirei. :)
Hello :) I know that Brasil is a beautiful country (very nice photos!). Unfortunately, today is too far for me, but maybe int he future... :) Best regards --Pudelek (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood composition and QI -- Spurzem 21:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply] @Spurzem: It is FP? --ArionEstar 22:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply] I think so. -- Spurzem 09:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply] @Spurzem: Please. I already have two active nominations. If you want, you can nominate it. Only if you want. ArionEstar 11:45, 14 January 2015 (UTC) It is not necessary, I'll wait one of my nominations finish. ArionEstar 11:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Agradeciendo la re-nominación de mi imagen. De Ivan2010[edit]
Hola -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk), disculpa le escriba en español, que es mi lengua natal, pero se me hace bastante difícil poder escribir en ingles expresando correctamente lo que quiero decir, ojalá pueda usted leer mis letras. Le agradezco su re-nominación del mi: File:Calle en Trinidad que da acceso al Casco Historico.JPG/2, ni siquiera tenía conocimientos de que una imagen podía ser nominada más de una vez. En la primera nominación culminó con 10 votos a favor y 6 en contra, con opiniones y criterios muy fuertes, habrá que ver y esperar esta nueva nominación que piensa la comunidad, aunque yo pudiera subir una nueva versión de la misma mejorada si usted lo considera, si cree que esto puede ayudar, solo hágamelo saber. De todas formas le repito mi agradecimiento por la re-nominación, y por haberme enseñado algo que no sabía; la posibilidad de nominar más de una vez. Le deseo las mejores cosas del mundo para usted. Un saludo afectuoso desde aquí; Ivan2010
@Ivan2010: Yes. This is a picture. You do what you want with it... Thank you! This is mutual! I wish all the best to you! Many gretings! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:49, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hola -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) partiendo de la re-nominación que usted hizo de la imagen mía, (y a pesar de que la misma tuvo que ser eliminada como candidata), como te dije en mis anteriores palabras de aquel momento, aprendí nuevas cosas posibles de hacer que no sabía, algo que seguiré agradeciéndote, y decidí entonces mejorar otra imagen mía que nominé hace 1 año, para subirla actualizada como candidata igualmente a FP. Apreciaría mucho si pudieses pasarte por allí y emitir tu opinión sobre ella, quizás haya más suerte. Una vez más gracias por todo y un saludo afectuoso para ti desde aquí. -- Ivan2010 (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2015
Movida de Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Jardim Botânico Fanchette Rischbieter em Curitiba 02.jpg[edit]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Não. Eu nomeei a imagem porque eu gosto dela. Não disse em nenhum momento que eu nomeei a imagem por causa do país de onde ela foi tirada. Eu a nomeei porque eu penso que ela poderia ser FP. Ela é QI, mas isso não quer dizer que ela possa ou não ser FP. Ela, para mim, tem boa qualidade. As pessoas e a composição não me incomodam. Só porque eu nomeei uma foto brasileira que teve votos contra não quer dizer que eu a nomeei por causa do país. Não complique as coisas. E quem vê assim parece que eu nunca nomeei nenhuma foto que se tornou FP. Veja algumas fotos brasileiras que eu nomeei e que se tornaram FP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Não pense que eu estou chateado porque você votou contra/"discordou" da foto, pelo contrário, a sua opinião é bem-vinda, eu estou aprendendo muita coisa com isso, com esta organização sem fins lucrativos, e com os seus usuários. Basicamente, eu aprendi coisas (muitas) sobre efeitos fotográficos, técnica para tirar fotos, métodos de edição da foto etc. E se eu estou errando em algo aqui, eu vou tentar acertar e melhorar. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Amanhecer no Hercules --.jpgFile:Memorial J Kubitschek Brasilia statue.jpgFile:1 rocinha night 2014 panorama.jpg pra mim não seriam imagens para estar em destaque, a primeira tem um elemento grande de distração sem razão nenhuma para estar ali, e um pós-processamento muito além do ideal e muito mal feito, diga-se de passagem. A segunda não tem nada de especial... a terceira é muito interessante, mas tem muitas falhas de técnicas. Quase nenhuma das que você indicou tiveram massiva aceitação, e a razão é simples, têm muitos erros.
E tem um problema você ficar indicando dessa forma, depois pode ficar complicado indicar fotografias com temáticas brasileiras, pois as pessoas daqui estarão saturadas dessa chuva de fotografias meia boca.
Minha dica é limpar os olhos, aquieaqui a maioria dessas fotos sim, têm qualidade superior, e não tem tantas falhas técnicas.
E ai você pode começar a entender o quão brutal é a diferença entre as entradas que vc criou e uma imagem de qualidade. -- RTA 16:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Compreendo. Eu já sei o que devo fazer... Eu me concentrava muito nisso do Brasil e me esquecia dos outros... Mas eu vou tentar agora não fazer mais isso, certo? Eu me restringia só nisso ou naquilo outro, e esquecia do resto do mundo. Pois tem tanto país aí e eu só ficava no Brasil... E RTA, se você precisar de nomear alguma imagem sua e não tiver como, por favor, contate-me e peça para mim que eu irei nomeá-la, ok? Best regards to you! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Acho que não entendeu...
Entrou nos links que lhe enviei? Se encontrar imagens aqui que tenham níveis semelhantes de qualidade, mesmo que sejam só do Brasil, acho interessante que você nomeei. Agora, precisa entender mais do que faz uma boa foto, e também abrir a imagem em sua maior qualidade possível e ver os detalhes. Sei que não tem o costume por suas indicações, volto de novo para a minha foto, que claramente quem votou à favor não o fez em tela cheia, já que estava grosseira a perda de dados...
Há outros elementos que devem ser considerados, exemplo: A foto do jardim botânico de Curitiba, a primeira que você nomeou é igual à praticamente 80% das fotos que você encontra se procurar jardim botânico Curitiba... uns 15% tem a estátua da fonte que deixa já a foto bem mais interessante, e aí vem as fotos únicas, que deveriam ser destaque, que tem aquele "wow" que se ler muitos ali esperam em uma FP. [3][4][5][6][7]. E pq isso ocorre, pq não é ordinário, pq seguem regras de composição, pq não têm falhas técnicas, pq a pessoa pensou antes de tirar a foto, chegou perto do seu objeto...
E antes que pense, não, não é exigência de mais, não, não estou exigindo que o cara seja profissional, há um degrau considerável entre as fotos que eu lhe mandei e fotos pro [8][9]...
Por tu ajuda na nominação de imagems de Brasil no commons, e por reconhecer a calidad do que realmente importa. Muito obrigado mi bom amigo The_Photographer (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have uploaded an alternative crop and would appreciate if you could indicate a preference, or that you have no strong preference. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 12:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for your message.
You write under my photohttps://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Serratula_seoanei,_Zaagblad_02.JPG&oldid=prev&diff=150677034: Famberhorst Note: I suggest you renominate it. Because I do not know how the English language, I do not know exactly what you mean.
With regards,
Take care not to pick up some croped paitings (problem is it should never be croped, must not be !...and i dont check that, sometimes cant be checked neither), also if its not good IQ leave it for latter. Not all of them are good, despite beeing valuable. Regards. --Mile (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But on wikipedia en - there is no part of Indonesia in Oceania - I hope you understand that Indonesia does not associate itself with oceania. It is in either Asia or South East Asia. sats (talk) 11:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
but, despite that edit, I have been told by an admin on wp en that it is likely that someone will revert that - despite the very specific project, portal and article about oceania - whcih actually exclude indonesia from it. as with commons the same with wp en - it is all the same, we need to grin and bear it ... sats (talk) 13:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mas eu já visitei o Brazil mais de uma vez, ArionEstar! A última vez foi em 2009: estive em Ouro Preto (Belo Horizonte) e numa pequena cidade do estado de São Paulo, Presidente Prudente. Ia morrendo de calor! Também já lá tinha estado muitos anos antes: no Rio, em Belém e no Recife; mas nessa altura não havia fotografia digital! O problema é que vou sempre em trabalho, nunca em turismo. A próxima vez vai ser provavelmente em 2017: Belo Horizonte. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Alvesgaspar: Mas você tem feito turismo em outros países da Europa ou somente em Portugal (Aliás, que fotos incríveis que você tirou aí no seu país!)? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Também tirei fotos no Brazil, embora poucas porque o tempo nunca esteve bom: [[11]] -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá, tudo bem? Fiz os ajustes prometidos, inclusive a imagem ficou maior mesmo com corte, melhorei a qualidade do exportação e nos detalhes. A legenda também está em inglês e português e com maiores detalhes.
@Webysther: Parabéns pela edição! Agora agora eu não posso nominar a foto pois já tenho 2 fotos nominadas, o máximo permitido, mas se você quiser, pode nominá-la. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Webysther: Eu tenho ajudado a aumentar a quantidade de fotos desta categoria: Category:Featured pictures of Brazil. Como eu não tenho câmera profissional, eu procuro fotos do Brasil aqui no Commoms e nomino-as. Se você quiser, pode também ajudar a aumentar essa categoria, fotografando e/ou nominando. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Trabalho realmente interessante, vou ajudar sim. Se você encontrar imagens ruins de locais em São Paulo que não tem registro melhor me avise, posso tentar produzir melhores imagens. -- Webysther (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Não sei se ajuda, mas essa imagem já está a alguns passos de se tornar uma imagem especial. :) -- Webysther (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question@Webysther: Será que tem como retirar a duplicação que eu falei? Olhando detalhamente, as algas amarelas estão duplicadas. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Já perguntei isso! :S 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Então, não sei como fazer isso, o movimento dela durante a exposição pode ter causado a duplicação, você poderia adicionar uma nota em um lugar que esteja incomodando? Abs. -- Webysther (talk) 10:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá, tudo bem? Depois dos problemas relacionados a ruído e nitidez em diversas imagens, eu percebi claramente que alguns problemas só podem ser resolvidos fazendo outra imagem (quando for possível). Foi com base nisso que sumi, estive estudando para saber o que poderia fazer para aumentar a nitidez em diversas situações e também o ruido, fiquei impressionado como são detalhes muito pequenos que transformam uma imagem de ruim para super nítida. Quando tiver um tempo, se puder dar uma olhada, estou enviando novas imagens aos poucos, mas com qualidade excepcional (nitidez/ruído), e o melhor de tudo, o mesmo equipamento. :)
Agradável! Parabéns e mais boas fotos! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, She left Spain when she was very young, and never comes back. This picture was certainly not taken in Spain. So I would agree to add a category "People of Spain", when not "Pictures of Spain". Regards, Yann (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Featured Picture nominations: Groups of images[edit]
Hi,
I see you frequent the FP candidates page often, so I'd like to ask you how to nominate a group of images. The nomination guide on the FP candidates page mentions group nominations, but never explains how it's done. Any help really appreciated. --LB 12:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Arion, i havent see you put some of your photo on voting. You dont make them ? I have a friend in Caonas, she is pro photograper. You migth start some if interested. Any camera you own ? --Mile (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A shot from cell phonw, which isnt so bad. With some more serious cam you could gain up on a level. If some is into photo, and its his hobby, than that one will learn quick. Just spare some realos. --Mile (talk) 17:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@PetarM: Thanks for comments. As regards the composition and the subject, certainly it's very nice. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
He stated in photo its High relieef, but migth be combined (from sunken) also as i can see. Should be shot from side to be more sure. --Mile (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Convite - Concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015[edit]
Bem vindo ao Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Natural
Olá ArionEstar,
No ano anterior você participou da primeira edição do concurso fotográfico Wiki Loves Earth Brasil enviando ótimas fotografias!
O concurso foi um grande sucesso graça a sua participação e ajuda!
Este ano estamos repetindo o sucesso do ano anterior, já são mais de 1.000 participantes e mais de 7.500 fotos recebidas até o momento.
Você poderá participar do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 até o dia 31 de Maio e concorrer a R$9.000,00 em premiações!
Esta ano, estamos premiando 2 categorias, categoria melhor foto onde premiaremos as 3 melhores fotos do concurso e a categoria melhores contribuições onde premiaremos os usuários que mandarem a maior quantidade de fotos úteis.
Até o momento os 3 participantes que enviaram mais fotografias enviaram respectivamente 356, 297 e 93 fotografias.
Além da premiação em dinheiro, as melhores fotografias serão publicadas na edição de Agosto da revista impressa Fotografe Melhor da Editora Europa.
Agradecemos a sua participação desde já e obrigado pelas fotos enviadas no ano anterior!
Para maiores informações e para submeter suas novas fotografias, acesse o site do concurso e participe!
Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos e colegas e também curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.
Em breve anunciaremos novidades sobre os vencedores e a exposição das melhores fotografias do concurso.
Atenciosamente,
Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015
Você ainda poderá submeter mais fotos até o dia 31 de maio e ampliar suas chances na premiação de até R$2.000,00!
Estamos premiando 2 categorias, categoria melhor foto onde premiaremos as 3 melhores fotos do concurso e a categoria melhores contribuições onde premiaremos os usuários que mandarem a maior quantidade de fotos úteis.
Até o momento os 3 participantes que enviaram mais fotografias enviaram respectivamente 356, 297 e 93 fotografias.
Além da premiação em dinheiro, as melhores fotografias serão publicadas na edição de Agosto da revista impressa Fotografe Melhor da Editora Europa.
Agradecemos a sua participação desde já, obrigado pelas fotos enviadas, elas serão usadas em vários dos nossos projetos.
Para melhorar suas chances envie mais fotos para o concurso. acesse o site do concurso e submeta mais fotografias!
Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.
Em breve anunciaremos novidades sobre os vencedores e a exposição das melhores fotografias do concurso.
Atenciosamente,
Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015
As this tilt fix is just a so minor fix there, then maybe it should still be practical to apply it to the original image? Or what do you think? Kruusamägi (talk) 09:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Realmente o WLE 2014 e WLE 2015 foram um grande sucesso, mas há muito trabalho a ser feito. Aproveitando seu interesse, gostaria de convida-lo para nos ajudar no processo de revisão das fotos recebidas. Temos 13.000 fotos do WLE 2015 para filtrar e selecionar as melhores para que os jurados possam dar nota. Tenho várias boas idéias, o que falta é gente pra apoiar o trabalho. Se tiver com tempo aí, entre em contato por email rodrigopadula AT gmail DOT com ou por aqui mesmo, que daí te passo os links, login e senha para acessar a ferramenta do concurso WLE. Conto com sua colaboração. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Topa dar uma revisada nas fotos no sistema? Temos que filtrar todas as fotos enviadas para que os jurados possam dar nota. É um sistema externo desenvolvido pelo pessoal da Ucrania. Eles criaram uma conta única que estamos utilizando para filtrar e em seguida repassar para os jurados do concurso. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 01:18, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Rodrigo Padula: Não sei, se isso não me custar muito tempo… Mas eu vou ver o que eu posso fazer. Eu posso avaliá-las, mas não sei se eu vou conseguir avaliar todas. Como funciona método de avaliação? Parece que não, mas eu tenho só 1 ano e pouco de Commons. Tem muita coisa que ainda eu não sei mexer por aqui. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
O sistema de avaliação é fora do commons, é bem simples, me mande um email que te passo as orientações, login e senha, não posso passar por aqui :-) Rodrigo Padula (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There are a lot of uncategorized FPs out there. What I do is categorize the newly promoted ones, but I only started this effort maybe two years ago. The older FPs remain forgotten, for most of them, outside of the FP category tree. Thierry Caro (talk) 10:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Remember that you asked me to fix the EXIF on this file?
Well, it turns out that my 'fix' introduced another problem in the EXIF as it stripped the sRGB colour profile data due to an error in the script I used (it has now been corrected). I am now in the process of the repairing the damage done on all the uploads where I have used this script with errors.
So, I would like to upload a new version of this photo by Webysther, where this problem with the color profile data is fixed, but it requires that I use the original where the profile data is in it to derive a corrected version, and since then you have edited the picture as well by cropping it. So, it takes a little more.
If I upload a new version based on the original with correct EXIF (and intact colour profile) data would you then be willing to crop it again as you did previously? -- Slaunger (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Slaunger: Surely, but not today. I wanted someone to fix the notes done by The Photographer for nominate it as FPC. Thanks again for your contribution. ;) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, just ping me when it will be convenient! -- Slaunger (talk) 12:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You were asking me why my upload of File:Leonardo da Vinci - presumed self-portrait - lossless.png was in png. I've decided to create a little guide for commons on this as I haven't found anything like it. I'd be happy if you could take a look at the very early draft I've made and decide for yourself if you feel it seems reasonable.
Olá, tento tocar esse projeto pelo potencial não explorado que vejo aqui na comunidade brasileira. Ano passado geramos ótimos resultados e esse ano dobramos, então sigo apoiando. Queria ajudar mais, mas acabo ficando sobrecarregado fazendo quase tudo do concurso.Bora fazer uma força tarefa para organização dessas fotos e uso na Wikipédia?
Hi, Please do not renominate a file you just withdrew. More generally, you should choose more carefully your nominations. The remark about your withdraws was quite right actually. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Excuse me Arion but I have Withdrawn my photo that you were appointed because they were starting to get to me, sorry for the inconvenience. See the bright side, you can appoint someone else. Hello and sorry again . --LivioAndronico(talk) 21:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Charlesjsharp! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Good idea... Already done Rio and Iguassu and going in September 2015 to the Pantanal and Southern Amazon Basin for a couple of weeks. You'll hopefully see my pictures in October!! Charles (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey Arion, check this, maybe is worth to nominate, or not. Not mine, but saw it, nice pattern. Whats with your camera, make any progress ? regards, --Mile (talk) 16:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@PetarM: I think this picture is better. I'm so sorry. I do not feel excited to photograph anything. I also feel like I will not be active for a long time at Commons. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Might be, but first is good as pattern, second is more strange crop. You should take some rest, or slow down a bit. --Mile (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, You should select candidates better instead of nominating all nice images you find, and then withdrawing a little later. I already asked you that above, as well as Jee. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá ArionEstar, percebi que você tem uma grande experência em nomear belas imagens para destaque, você poderia me dar algumas dicas sobre o que observar nas imagens para verificar se atende os requisitos? Dei uma lida em Commons:Image guidelines, mas fiquei com algumas dúvidas. Por exemplo, achei essa imagem muito boa File:Calice.JPG, o que você achou? Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá Arion, sem querer atrapalhar, mas já atrapalhando, indiquei a imagem File:Aquário Natural.jpg para QI e me foi solicitado noise reduction e um melhor crop. Você poderia me dar alguma dica em como fazer esse tal de noise reduction. Rodrigolopes (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Rodrigolopes: Noise reduction = redução de ruído; crop = corte. Não sou muito bom em edição de imagens. Para melhores esclarecimentos, pergunte a Poco a poco, eu acho que ele pode te ajudar. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Kinda. I'm going to have to start over - the original image that one was based upon was a very bad copy of the one (now?) on Gallica, so there's no point starting with it. I can certainly improve the image, though. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Going to see what Crisco thinks about the colours and crop. If he's happy, you'll probably see it at FPC. (En-wiki's; Commons tends to slow down my nominations enough that he could be a while) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for the nomination. I noticed it just yesterday for I didn't have a look on the FP-candidates in the last two weeks --Llez (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Arion, if you will have free slot for nominee and wont find anything interesting let me know. --Mile (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
CONVITE - CONCURSO FOTOGRÁFICO Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Histórico
Olá ArionEstar,
Obrigado por ter participado do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014/2015.
Ao longo destas duas edições contamos com a participação de quase 3.000 fotógrafos e recebemos ao todo mais de 20.000 imagens que estão sendo usadas para ilustrar artigos da Wikipédia e enriquecendo o nosso repositório de imagens aqui no Wikimedia Commons. Devido ao grande sucesso das duas edições do WLE, decidimos trazer para o Brasil o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo, que será realizado de 1 a 30 de setembro de 2015.
O Wiki Loves Monuments é organizado em vários países do mundo e é considerado desde 2011 pelo Livro dos Recordes como maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Estamos aqui para te convidar a fazer parte da historia e do maior concurso fotográfico já realizado!
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Wow! O processamento ficou inacreditável! Mas, se me permite fazer um comentário, os vitrais agora estão muito brilhantes (Overexposed). 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
É que vc não viu a diferença entre a parede os vitrais, esse o limite, começa a ficar estranho... já está bem longe da realidade eheheheheh... mas antes não dava pra ver o vitral, agora vc pode ver Jesus... -- RTA 10:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
tire suas conclusões... hehehehe, a igreja estava escura e o vidro ridiculamente claro, pra ser uma FP, teria que voltar outro dia... -- RTA 10:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Sério cara? Eu pensei que é a iluminação da igreja que não é boa, então eu achei que não seria culpa sua. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk)
Daria para ir de noite, em que eles ligam as luzes de dentro, e o vitral simplesmente ficaria na mesma luz... na verdade eu precisava passar mais do que 15 min na igreja pra saber quais seriam as melhores luzes. -- RTA 10:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mas estava escura, culpa minha de insistir de tirar naquela luz, se olhar Exposure time 1/40 sec (0.025), essa é a mais escura, a que eu mandei pra vc ver nesse link...
ahhhhh, tá forte a edição, não é fp mesmo, mas dá pra arrumar... mas essa File:Palacete Azul 04.jpg tá mais interessante... nunca tinha visto lustres assim, e olhando assim temos a grande diferença. -- RTA 11:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: O que você acha que poderia fazer com a foto? A composição é muito boa e o ângulo é quase perfeito. O lustre está devidamente centralizado na imagem, mas por causa do ângulo quase que perfeito, parece que tem mais espaço de um lado do que de outro. Qualidade é boa eu penso, mas eu sinto falta de um pouquinho de brilho. Na minha opinião a segunda foto estaria mais interessante se estive mais espaço em baixo, está muito apertado o assunto. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Também acho que precisava de mais espaço... jpeg é foda... vou ver... -- RTA 11:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
vc nem reparou que eu aumentei o espaço de baixo do lustre? Tá tudo meio cagado, a foto é ruim, o lugar é legal. -- RTA 02:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Arion, I saw that other pic, its not more interesting than first option, composition is not so good. So no benefit of improving. Problem is also WB is pretty off, I would need RAW file to make it similar like we already have now. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello Arion, I am now at home and just reworked and uploaded a new version of that file. I have serious doubts that it can become FP because, even after the rework, the image quality is not really good. Sorry, I cannot do magic... :( Poco2 13:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
I can rotate it, but you tell me what direction. I am not sure what is vertical there. --Mile (talk) 16:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I did it, check it, I hope is near what it have to be, but some crop was made due to it. Hope OK with others. --Mile (talk) 16:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, true. My country...small, sporty and proud nation. We can be bombed by whole NATO for 3 months but be dot get scared. We keep our friends and never turn them back, what I am proud of. Our soul prefer more East mind than West, we like more BRICS than NATO. --Mile (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@PetarM: Historically, your country is very good to study: the context of the Cold War, the Kosovo situation, the relations with neighboring countries... Here in Brazil, though few know Serbia, we have a vision of Europe = Money, money, money, capitalism, the best HDI, not slum, not poverty... The richest continent... But each country has its peculiarities. Here, Brazil has great natural beauties, a continental dimension, a strong biodiversity, but the healthy and the education... Soooooo bad (and other issues)! Greetings to Serbia! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
True, our people are smart, Tesla was Serbian. Problem is we were 500 years under Turks, which made lot of damage and slow the progress, then we have 2 world wars and Germans want to extinct Slavic people, fasizm... But we are going up. Kosovo, one more case of western (American) hegemony. Now that time is over. I will have guests from Brasil in January, a couple from Caonas and Porto Alegre. For education, I am sure will be better and better, just don't get too much energy on that football. --Mile (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@PetarM: The big evil of Brazil is only thinking about football and forget the other things... People just want to think about getting drunk, partying, but few people are interested in the social development of the country (health, education, poverty, HDI)... I can say that few Brazilians know Commons, for example. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for nominating my image. Much appreciated. Charles (talk) 09:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi - how do I send a thanks message?, like you did to me - can't work it out... Charles (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, Arion - question...since the TIF and JPG are exactly the same image (just on different formats) would you log your support in the TIF section rather than the JPG section? That's why I noted there was a JPG available and linked it. I wanted to avoid 3 different consensus sections and a fragmented consensus. Thx in advance!! ~~~~ {{unsigned|Atsme|23:01, 31 October 2015}}
@Atsme: Because JPG is the standard format of the pictures. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, my! I entirely missed that requirement in the candidacy guidelines. In fact, I thought PNG and TIF were the preferred formats because they are of much higher quality. Would you be so kind as to point me to the JPG requirement because I've been unable to locate it, and I don't want my work being dismissed simply because I failed to upload it on a lesser format. Thanks in advance....Atsme😊Consult 23:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Atsme: TIF, PNG, GIF and SVG are commonly used for animations and images generated from virtual programs. Anyway, it's a great work! More animals in water! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ow, quando vc remove algo da foto, tipo uma pessoa, você deve criar outro arquivo, clone stamp não é nada aceito em várias situações, e o que você fez aqui: File:Sunset at Noronhas' beach.jpg, deveria ter sido feito em um arquivo separado, e como eu disse, é uma foto bem merda do ponto de vista educacional, principalmente quando você retirou a escala. Só passou para provocarem o Colin... vc está abaixando o nível das FP e dê um jeito de arrumar essa porqueira que vc fez, por favor. -- RTA 08:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Tirando outra foto, com uma câmera melhor, ou com o tripé e 70 fotos... a costura eu não tinha reparado, o ruído não tem como mesmo, para ter noção são 7 fotos na direita para ficar com o ruído que está, repare que na esquerda está bem pior, que acho que tem umas 3 fotos, fiz correndo, tinha outras coisas por fazer.
Ué, ele embargou a votação anterior... é uma foto de qualidade muito duvidável pra passar assim.
O problema é que a votação foi para a sua versão, eu sugiro reupar em um arquivo separado, e mandar o FP para a outra versão. -- RTA 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah, eu poderia criar fp de lugar, mas dá muuito trampo e eu não curto, acaba tirando o propósito. :P talvez eu faça uma na sexta. -- RTA 15:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you select the image and have it presented as FP. I hesitated to introduced myself and when I see the results of voting, I have no regrets that you ayiez before me. Thank you again.
(Obrigado selecione a imagem e tê-lo apresentado como FP. Hesitei em me apresentei e quando eu ver os resultados da votação, eu não tenho arrependimentos que você ayiez antes de mim. Obrigado mais uma vez.) --Medium69You wanted talk to me? 12:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
During these Christmas holidays, I wanted to let you take advantage of this delight, I hope you can enjoy them with love. --The Photographer (talk) 16:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@The Photographer: Muito obrigado! Tudo de melhor pra vc! Eu estou pasmo com o que aconteceu com o Museu da Língua Portuguesa. Infelizmente uma grande perda. :( 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The nomiation of my picture is a Christmas gift for me, thanks very much!!! Merry Christmas!!! Ezarateesteban 20:49, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
* Feliz Año Nuevor! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
Deseo que este nuevo año venga cargado de bienaventuranza para ti y para los tuyos. Un año nuevo lleno de muchos nuevos retos que yo estoy seguro conseguirás superar. Te he dejado este video, con un mensaje positivo, lleno de esperanza y amor. De mi, un Venezolano que te aprecia. Saludos --The Photographer (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Reply[reply]
Hi Arion, I was in your country, in Rio de Janeiro and I took this picture, I put the original link to RAW files. Could you see if it is possible to fix perspectives, do you know this cathedral to do it? Regards!! --Ezarateesteban 14:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ezarate: I tried to fix the perspective distortion and the vertical tilt. Did you like it? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you!! Do you think it could be a QIC? --Ezarateesteban 22:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Que tem uma porrada de erros e eu preciso voltar lá, a lente não é nítida nas laterais e ficou cagada. :P -- RTA 09:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Rodrigo, esta muito muitisimo legal!! Eu adore, votare support, mas eu acredito que tem ums problemas de tilt. --The Photographer (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, it's just a notification to say I added an alternative after your vote. Regards, Christian Ferrer(talk) 19:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Obrigado pelo "#SOSVenezuela", eu subi outra imagem do museu de Arte Sacra, gustaria de conhecer suas criticas. Obrigado senhor --The Photographer (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Esa tem um problema de perspectica que preciso concertar primero, aviso para você quando tuver pronta --The Photographer (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Você tem um bom coração e capacidad de ajudar a outras pessoas, você sempre esta ficando muito atento com a qualidade das imagems no commons. Obrigado por fazer este espaço mais agradavel. The Photographer (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá, tenho acompanhando suas colaborações aqui no commons e gostaria de te convidar para nos dar uma força no Wiki Loves Earth Brasil. Organizo este concurso desde 2014 para trazer mais gente pro commons e conteúdos de boa qualidade para ilustrar a Wikipédia. Estamos com uma foçar tarefa, se tiver interesse e tempo em ajudar, será otimo para melhorarmos os resultados do WLE 2016. Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá, queria aproveitar a oportunidade do WLE para convidá-lo para fazer parte do corpo de jurados que avaliará as fotos vencedoras do concurso em Julho. Normalmente filtramos cerca de 500 fotos dentre todas recebidas para que os jurados avaliem dando notas de 1-10 segundo qualidade artistica e tecnica. Caso tenha interesse e disponibilidade, entre em contato. Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Eu já não gosto nenhum pouco de lidar com a Wikipédia, não dá, só tem gente porcaria lá, e você vai e faz uma copyvio que eu tenho de reverter e agora um idiota reverte para a sua violação. Você não tem noção como isso me alterou, acabou com a porra do meu dia ter que fazer essa reversão, de novo, pq vcs não leem uma porcaria que está em literalmente todas as páginas, todas as páginas, de todas as Wikis. Muito obrigado mesmo. Saco. -- RTA 04:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not sure why you reverted to the old file because the change was made by an admin. As I recall, the newly named cropped image was promoted to FA. Atsme📞 18:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Atsme: The users supported the original image, not the cropped version. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nope - they supported the cropped version. Promoted File:Yellow papillae flatworm (Thysanozoon nigropapillosum) (cropped).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 5:58 am, 22 December 2015, Tuesday (5 months, 11 days ago) (UTC−6)
This nomination was very close, with essentialy everyone supporting both versions. However, as 2 users expressed a preference for the cropped version, this is the one that get's promoted. Armbrust The Homunculus 5:58 am, 22 December 2015, Tuesday (5 months, 11 days ago) (UTC−6)Atsme📞 18:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you!! My heart starts racing when a move or name change is needed. I am clueless about that part of the process (and worse when it comes to categories). Also, thank you for the congrats - it was such an honor for me to have 2 images nominated by my peers. Atsme📞 18:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not as nice as France-my-fatherland, of course, but it deserves some (a lot of !) visits ! I'm trying to buy a holiday house there...--Jebulon (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello dear ArionEstar. I would be glad to know your opinion about this image. I spent hours to illustrate it so it definitely will be important for me to know and see your opinion in this page. Thank you and also thanks for your contributions on Wikimedia projects. Ali Zifan 22:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@The Photographer: A primeira não é suficientemente nítida e a segunda possui forte distorção de perspectiva. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just realized that I never exactly answered your question about what "perfect" is to me, so here it is: Wabi-sabi, that is the sort of aesthetic I treasure most of all. That is beauty to me. w.carter-Talk 17:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sorry, but until March 2017 I can not vote for a six-month blockade that has been imposed on me in this discussion, so do not be offended is not out of malice. For the rest if I am a servant here. Greetings --LivioAndronico(talk) 08:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
English: Hellow ArionStar, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá Arion, muito obrigado pelo gesto de vir aqui a se despedir. No primer momento eu senti muita tristeza, porém, eu entendo que existen prioridades que vc precisa atender, a wiki pode esperar. Eu também pase momentos muito gratos com você e muitas veces quando eu estava um pouco desencorajado vc sempre estava ali para me apoiar. Você e meu amigo, não conheço a você pessoalmente mas gostaria algum dia. Obrigado por formar parte de minha vida aqui eternamente grato. The Photographer 00:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think it would be a good courtesy to leave a talk-page not for newbies (redlink users) when their images get nominated at FPC. Otherwise they may have no clue. -- Colin (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes I looked at that list of contributions, although I guess we can disagree about what 'regular' is, I did see a lot of their own work contributed. So I chose to be inclusive and count them as part of the community here and as an active user. I also expressed my disagreement with sharing a link to their Facebook profile on here. Even if it is a publicly available profile, I don't think it was really very appropriate to do that, even though you were trying to help other users understand who the author was/give them more information about it. It feels like too much personal information was 'exposed' when the user is not an outsider to the community and has an account here. I take from my own experience that I would not like my Facebook profile linked on here, just as a personal decision. Would you consider removing the link? Let me know your thoughts. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Não preciso dizer que você tem minha expressa autorização para realizar cortes ou o que achar melhor para qualquer imagem que eu fizer de forma irrevogável, SEJE feliz. -- Webysther (talk) 22:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Aproveitando, se você achar boas imagens de outros lugares no Brasil mas que precisava ser feita com maior qualidade vai me passando que eu coloco em uma lista para fazer. Vale para todo o Brasil. --Webysther (talk) 22:23, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Webysther: Engraçado que eu sempre editei fotos aqui no Commons e ninguém falava nada sobre consentimento de autor, agora que está acontecendo isso… Já que você falou, observei que não temos muitas imagens de qualidade de capitais estaduais (exceto São Paulo e Rio, que detêm o monopólio, inclusive São Paulo possui The Photographer, que inclusive é da Venezuela, como fotógrafo regular); se você analisar bem, temos mais imagens destacadas do interior do Brasil do que nas metrópoles e centros urbanos. Nesses quatro anos de Wiki vi o número de fotos do Brasil explodir como nunca, até mais do que certos países da Europa. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Não temos mais o @The Photographer: , parece que ele foi morar em outro país, se eu não entendi errado ele foi morar no Canadá. Vou me basear bastante no legado que ele deixou. Tem como ser mais preciso sobre as fotos? Tipo: "Webysther faz uma foto de tal catedral, a foto xyz que você pode ter uma idéia tem tais problemas...". Dessa forma eu posso me planejar melhor. Estarei indo para Minas Gerais pelos próximos meses. --Webysther (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Webysther: Ok, sendo direto: falta fotos de cidades e centros urbanos, museus, monumentos, principalmente de capitais, etc. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:16, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Before the calendar turns a new leaf over, before the social networking sites get flooded with messages, before the mobile networks get congested, let me take a quiet moment out to wish you a wonderful, happy, healthy and prosperous New Year.
Cuidado só com as nomeações cara, tem gente que... putz, melhor dar uma evitada viu? Ainda mais depois de tudo que rolou aqui no Brasil quanto a Wikimedia, você não tem noção a bola de bosta de neve que algumas coisas podem virar. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 05:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Oi kkkk Fiquei um certo tempo inativo no Commons e quando apareci, já rolou treta kkkk Estão acontecendo duas discussões ao mesmo na página, e como diz o bom e velho meme da Glória Pires: “Não sou capaz de opinar” kkkkkkk 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pan de jamón and Hallaca are a typical Christmas dish of my country, and I would like to share it with you, wishing you the best year 2019.. I would like to give you this humble recognition. Happy year 2019 dear!!! Photographer 01:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Arion, You need to answer questions. You can write in Portuguese if you are not comfortable writing in English. But for now, you are blocked for 3 days. You cannot be retired, and then at the same post again low quality nominations on FPC, as you were requested not to do. I hope you understand, and come back with more useful nominations. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oi cara onde esta voce?. Que aconteceu? --Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Wilfredor: Eu acho que você não acompanhou a minha "derrocada" aqui no Commons. Por causa de desavenças e conflitos, desisti do projeto. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@ArionEstar: Tudos pasamos por momentos asim mas depois voltamos, nao se que aconteceu mas nao deixe que pessoas desviem voce do caminho do bem, de mostrar ao Brasil com contenido de alta qualidade, tenho sentido saudades do senhor. Faz pouco fui para o Brasil. Por favor, si acontece de novo me chama para brigar eu tambem --Wilfredor (talk) 00:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Tudos eles ficarom defendendo ao senhor hasta que você ficou chateado. Aqui tem muitos caras malucos que tentan tirar você arrumando qualquer desculpa. O importante e não se deixar levar pelas emoções. Olha o que aconteceu comigo a semana pasada, eu fui bloqueado na wikipedia en portugués por querer colocar uma melhor foto no artigo da estação da luz, uma foto que já tínhamos discutido na página de discussão do artigo, então vem Chronos e me bloqueou, o cara acha que os artigos são dele. Resumindo, a gente tem que se apoiar nestas coisas cara, escribe no meu e-mail e ali eu passo meno número para você, também o teles acho que foi embora --Wilfredor (talk) 02:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oi Arion, queria perguntar como esta tudo por la em relacao ao asunto do coronavirus Wilfredor (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oi Wil, em relação ao país, está menos pior que outros países da Europa, não sei se acompanha os noticiários internacionais; particularmente, eu estou passando por alguns problemas e vou ficar fora do nicho desgastante do Commons por um longo tempo ainda mais. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 14:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mas vc acha que ta menos pior por causa de que a doenca chegou depois no Brasil?, fico triste que voce tenha pasado mal, por favor, fica a vontade de me pedir si vc acha que eu posso ajudar em alguma coisa. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wilfredor, sim e porque tem menos mortes, ainda não estamos em lockdown; eu acho que este projeto é uma perda de tempo pra minha vida, não me faz mais feliz, nem menos triste, então sai, tenho problemas internos mais sérios para resolver do que me desgastar com algo que não me satisfaz. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pega tipo umas ferias e ali depois voce ve si quiser voltar ou nao. Muitas veces o que precisamos e tempo para pensar e solucionar outros problemas mais importantes em nossa vida depois acontece que tudo fica melhor. Tudo o mundo fica con saudades do senhor. Boa quarentena para voce tambem --Wilfredor (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Sajid-Wajid (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
For your ability to recognize good photographs where the other eyes are not used to see beyond the obvious Wilfredor (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Wilfredor: estou passando por uns conflitos internos comigo mesmo, por isso voltei por ser um passa-tempo. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 22:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Todos nós passamos por conflitos semelhantes, o importante é conversar com alguém sobre isso, se precisar falar sobre isso pode me escrever pelo whatsapp +15817772704. Abraços meu amigo, e lembre-se que o importante não é cair nesses buracos, mas sim levantar e sair deles. BTW, obrigado pela nominacao meu --Wilfredor (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:General Constand Viljoen (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
I cannot believe that I spelled Brazil wrong in making that category, and that no one noticed until now. Good for youǃ ̴̃ Krok6kola (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey, Arion! Just wanted to let you know I fixed a little more damage on this. Better to be open about such things, aye? Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, sorry, but you can't just go about moving your user page when you change username, the same way you do when you move files or other pages. All your links are now broken at every edit you've ever made. Please read Commons:Changing username and ask an admin for help to do this the right way so everything works again. Best, --Cart(talk) 21:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, I thought I was doing it the right way... :( ★ 22:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Don't be sad or upset, you can get your name changed as much as you want, but it has to be done by applying for it so you don't lose all the good things you've done here on the site. Just talk to the right people and they will help you with it. You were just a little impulsive. --Cart(talk) 22:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks a lot! ★ 00:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Arion! I got a message from Aristeas, about some problems that occurred because of the moving and things you did on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bebe Rexha @ Wiltern 06 30 2023 (53047143292).jpg. Once again, you were a little bit too eager to move pages without thinking about the consequences. Your edits messed up the whole timeline that should be preserved intact, to show other users how this image made its way to become FP. Aristeas will revet and fix things the right way again. I'm just leaving you this message so you will not be alarmed about what's going on. You do good work, but you are a little bit too enthusiastic about moving files sometimes. All the best, --Cart(talk) 09:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One move can often be made without disrupting links and history, but to move again and even want to delete one of the files involved in the process, will create a total mess. Tm is also being made aware to be careful about consequences of moving files. This is not about who made what, or who is right or wrong, just trust Aristeas to fix it so your nomination will be ok. --Cart(talk) 10:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Because the discussion is split now over various pages, I have answered it here, trying to explain what has happend and what is the easiest solution. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All this drama and mess would have been avoided if you, Arion, checked and fixed the images before you made the nomination. This is not the first time I've asked you this, and now I'm begging you to please, please, please, make sure file name, categories, and description are ok. Look for noise, CA or any other things that may come up during the voting. Ask for help first and nominate after that. You have been here long enough to know what a good photo should look like. That way, your nominations wouldn't be the workshops they often turn into, with all the complications and extra work that brings. I am begging you!!! --Cart(talk) 15:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
First steps tutorial
Getting help
Goodies, tips, and tricks
Made a mistake?
. But I'm really sorry I can not undertake the editing required, unfortunately I do not know how to do, I'm confused. Well, maybe a contributor will do it for me. Thank you for your encouragement. Best wishes and good weekend. Cordially.--Jlvenet (talk) 20:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
, el cual usted sí emitió su voto a favor, algo que le agradezco mucho, y por la importancia e interés que considero pueda tener esta maquinaria para la agricultura, (además de su impacto visual por su forma y tamaño), donde pudiera ayudar apoyando algún proyecto de la comunidad, he decidido subir una nueva foto del mismo, pero donde puede verse el equipo en toda su magnitud con otra perspectiva, 
, e igualmente la he nominado a candidata a FP. Le hago saber esto pues agradecería y apreciaría muchísimo si usted pudiera pasar y dar su nueva valoración y opinión sobre esta foto actual. Muchas gracias nuevamente. Un saludo cordial Ivan2010
.jpg)
.jpg)
ArionEstar (talk) 18:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Done. ArionEstar (talk) 22:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
.jpg)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg)
--LivioAndronico talk 21:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Question @Webysther: Será que tem como retirar a duplicação que eu falei? Olhando detalhamente, as algas amarelas estão duplicadas. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
), No derivative works (
), or All Rights Reserved (
), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as 
(CC BY), 
(CC BY-SA), 
(CC0) and 
(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.
.svg){kind=logo}
.JPG)
😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Request @PetarM: Please, could you do this? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC).jpg)
_female.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
_female.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-3_new.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_edit.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/84/20150107212114!Goiaba_vermelha.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Intern_of_Church_of_San_Francesco_in_Amelia.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_female.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_female.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_edited.jpg)
_-_edited.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(square_crop).jpg)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(denoised).jpg)
_(denoised).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&oldid=810137146){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(denoised).jpg){kind=link}
_restored.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}